Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Hospital Billing Varies Wildly, U.S. Data Shows

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 09 Mei 2013 | 13.57

A hospital in Livingston, N.J., charged $70,712 on average to implant a pacemaker, while a hospital in nearby Rahway, N.J., charged $101,945.

In Saint Augustine, Fla., one hospital typically billed nearly $40,000 to remove a gallbladder using minimally invasive surgery, while one in Orange Park, Fla., charged $91,000.

In one hospital in Dallas, the average bill for treating simple pneumonia was $14,610, while another there charged over $38,000.

Data being released for the first time by the government on Wednesday shows that hospitals charge Medicare wildly differing amounts — sometimes 10 to 20 times what Medicare typically reimburses — for the same procedure, raising questions about how hospitals determine prices and why they differ so widely.

The data for 3,300 hospitals, released by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, shows wide variations not only regionally but among hospitals in the same area or city.

Government officials said that some of the variation might reflect the fact that some patients were sicker or required longer hospitalization.

Nonetheless, the data is likely to intensify a long debate over the methods that hospitals use to determine their charges.

Medicare does not actually pay the amount a hospital charges but instead uses a system of standardized payments to reimburse hospitals for treating specific conditions. Private insurers do not pay the full charge either, but negotiate payments with hospitals for specific treatments. Since many patients are covered by Medicare or have private insurance, they are not directly affected by what hospitals charge.

Experts say it is likely that the people who can afford it least — those with little or no insurance — are getting hit with extremely high hospitals bills that may bear little connection to the cost of treatment.

"If you're uninsured, they're going to ask you to pay," said Gerard Anderson, the director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Hospital Finance and Management.

The debate over medical costs is growing louder, spurred partly by President Obama's overhaul of the health insurance system.

Hospitals, in particular, have come under scrutiny for charges that are widely viewed as difficult to comprehend, even for experts. "Our goal is to make this information more transparent," Jonathan Blum, the director of the agency's Center for Medicare, said in an interview.

The data covers bills submitted from virtually every hospital in the country in 2011 for the 100 most common treatments and procedures performed in hospitals, like hip replacements, heart operations and gallbladder removal.

The hospitals were not given the data before its release by Medicare officials.

Some hospitals contacted Tuesday said that the higher bills they sent to Medicare reflected the fact that they were either teaching hospitals or they had treated sicker patients.

For example, billing records showed that Keck Hospital of the University of Southern California charged, on average, $123,885, for a major artificial joint replacement, six times the average amount that Medicare reimbursed for the procedure and a rate significantly higher than the average for other Los Angeles area hospitals.

"Academic medical centers have a higher cost structure, and higher acuity patients who suffer from many health complications," the hospital said.

The hospital added that it wrote off any difference between what it charged and what Medicare paid, rather than seeking to collect it from patients. Centinela Hospital Medical Center, also in Los Angeles and owned by Prime Healthcare Services, charged $220,881 for the same procedure.

A spokesman said the hospital served a sicker and older patient base.

The data showing the range of hospital bills does not explain why one hospital charges significantly more for a procedure than another one. And Medicare does pay slightly higher treatment rates to certain hospitals — like teaching facilities or hospitals in areas with high labor costs.

Mr. Blum, the Medicare official, said he would have anticipated variations of two- to threefold at the most in the difference between what hospitals charge.

However, hospitals submitted bills to Medicare that were, on average, about three to five times what the agency typically pays to treat a condition, an analysis of the data by The New York Times indicates. And variations between what hospitals charge may be even greater.

Mr. Blum said he could not explain the reasons for that large difference.

An official at the American Hospital Association, a trade group, said there was a cat-and-mouse game between hospitals and insurers that affects what hospitals charge.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: May 9, 2013

An article on Wednesday about hospitals' widely varying billings for the same procedures misstated part of the name of the federal agency that released the billing data. It is the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (not the Center).


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

New York City Now Says It Can Speed Up Replacing School Lights Containing PCBs

Ángel Franco/The New York Times

Eleven people were hospitalized for breathing problems after an aging light ballast emitted smoke at P.S. 123 in Manhattan.

On Sept. 6, drops of an oily substance leaked from a light fixture on Staten Island and landed on a fifth grader seated for her first day of school. Last Friday, a light in Public School 170 in Brooklyn oozed a similar liquid onto floor tiles, forcing kindergartners to leave the class.

And on Tuesday, an antiquated light ballast emitted smoke into a classroom of middle-schoolers in Manhattan, sending nine students and two adults to a hospital with breathing difficulties and setting off an evacuation.

Regular episodes like these, as well as a federal lawsuit, are putting enormous pressure on the Bloomberg administration to speed up its process for replacing light fixtures containing the cancer-causing chemicals known as PCBs. The fight has pitted the city not only against an angry phalanx of parents, who are demanding the light fixtures be removed more quickly than the city has proposed, but also against the federal Environmental Protection Agency.

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg has taken up the issue himself, placing personal phone calls to President Obama's chief of staff and the head of the E.P.A. to plead for more time.

But on Wednesday, city officials released a statement saying the city could complete the job "well before the previously announced timetable of 2021." Because of continuing mediation in the lawsuit, city officials said they could not elaborate.

Since September, officials in the E.P.A.'s New York office have tracked 48 cases of light ballasts emitting smoke or leaking a tarlike material into classrooms, according to officials and the Service Employees International Union, which represents school custodial workers.

The city has said that in virtually all of the cases, its "wipe-testing" of surfaces in the area showed PCB levels were either too low to be detected or below the E.P.A. cleanup standard, which is 10 micrograms per square centimeter. The E.P.A. and others have asked the city to also test the air. But air monitoring is not mandatory, and the city has not made it part of the protocol. Margie Feinberg, a spokeswoman for the Department of Education, said that PCBs are "persistent in our environment," and that air testing could not definitively connect PCBs to a specific source.

But Michael Mulgrew, the president of the city teachers' union, the United Federation of Teachers, said the city was afraid that if air tests came back positive for PCBs it would "put more and more pressure on them."

PCBs, or polychlorinated biphenyls, are known carcinogens that have been linked to serious health problems including cancer, impaired immune and reproductive function, and lower I.Q. The long-term effects of exposure to elevated levels of PCBs in the air of school buildings is unclear. PCBs were used in lighting ballasts in many fixtures that were installed beginning in the 1950s.

In 1976, Congress banned a broad range of synthetic compounds known as PCBs.

Aging fixtures with leaking PCBs have also been detected in schools in several other states, including Massachusetts, North Dakota and Oregon.

Officials said that nearly 800 of the city's 1,400 school buildings could have PCB-containing lights. In 2011, the city agreed to replace those light fixtures within 10 years. That length of time, the city said, would allow it to more easily absorb the estimated cost, which has ranged from $700 million to nearly $850 million.

In March, Judge Sterling Johnson Jr. of Federal District Court in Brooklyn declined the city's request to dismiss the lawsuit demanding a speedier replacement plan. "The court will not begrudge the city its right to zealous advocacy, but neither will the court abide the city's insouciant foot-dragging, which, in the end, is all that can be said for its position," the judge wrote. "With the cognitive development of children at stake, it would have been refreshing to see humanitarian concerns trump the compulsion to delay litigation with quite so many spurious arguments."

The school system has finished work at 92 buildings, Ms. Feinberg said. This summer, she said, at least 105 buildings are scheduled to have their lighting fixtures replaced, including P.S. 123, the site of Tuesday's incident.

Karmah Herring, 14, was in the classroom when the light started emitting a foul odor. "It smelled like feet and yogurt and nastiness," she said. She told her teacher about the smell and "he thought it was coming from outside."

"After my class left, smoke started coming out a lot," she said.

All those taken to hospitals with breathing troubles were released later Tuesday.

On April 11, another smoking ballast was reported at the school, but testing of surfaces in the affected room showed PCB levels were too low to detect. No air monitoring was done. The Department of Education said tests following Tuesday's incident would take two days.

The city's statement on Wednesday that it could speed up the replacement plan was in marked contrast to the arguments Mr. Bloomberg made in 2011 to William M. Daley, then President Obama's chief of staff, and Lisa P. Jackson, the recently departed E.P.A. administrator.

Ms. Jackson characterized the mayor as "a New Yorker; tough," but not unpleasant. Despite his pleas, she said, she refused to change her position that the city needed to move faster.

"Every time we got more information, it pointed in the direction that the threat was larger than we previously thought, not smaller," she said.

Randy Leonard contributed reporting.


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

Undercover Video Targets Abortion Doctor

Brian Lehmann for The New York Times

Dr. LeRoy H. Carhart, who performs late-term abortions, in 2009. A group released a video of remarks it called inhumane.

An anti-abortion group released an undercover video on Wednesday showing what it says were offensive and inhumane remarks about abortions by one of the country's most prominent abortion doctors.

The release, by the activist group Live Action, is part of a new effort by abortion foes to portray clinics that perform later abortions, in the second or third trimester of pregnancy, as being riddled with illegal or cruel practices.

They also assert that the grisly and illegal practices alleged at the trial of Dr. Kermit B. Gosnell in Philadelphia, which include evidence of unsterile tools and untrained workers and charges that he killed babies born live by snipping their spines, are typical more widely.

The new video captures the doctor, LeRoy H. Carhart, using some imprudent phrases while discussing the process of a late-term abortion with women posing as patients. At one point he describes a fetus that has died after an injection in the womb as softening like "meat in a Crock-Pot." But the video provides no evidence of illegal action or subpar medical techniques.

Other medical experts as well as defenders of abortion rights said the comparison with Dr. Gosnell, who seemed to show blatant disregard for his patients and the law, was misleading and unfair.

"Comparing an offensive and inappropriate comment to Gosnell's horrific crimes is politics at its worst," said Eric Ferrero, vice president of communications for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

In the tape of two visits to a Nebraska clinic run by Dr. Carhart, dated Dec. 7 and March 28, a woman described as 22 weeks pregnant and another described as 26 weeks pregnant tell him that they want abortions, and they question him in detail about how it would be done. Both secretly taped the conversation and did not intend to have abortions.

Dr. Carhart did not respond to a request on Wednesday for comment.

Dr. Carhart is known for his widely reported vow to carry on the work of Dr. George R. Tiller, who performed late-term abortions in Kansas and was killed in 2009. In part to prevent Dr. Carhart from doing late-term abortions, Nebraska banned them after 22 weeks from a woman's last menstrual period, with few exceptions. He has continued to practice in Nebraska, performing earlier abortions, but he also opened a clinic in Germantown, Md., where the rules for late-term abortions are less stringent.

In the video, Dr. Carhart repeatedly emphasizes that he must abide by the law, telling both women that at their late stages, they would have to travel to Maryland for him to help them. He makes it clear that in the extremely unlikely event that a fetus emerges alive, the law requires trying to save it.

He describes his procedure for second- and third-trimester abortions, which take two to four days and involve first giving an injection to kill the fetus, then dilating the cervix, trying to induce labor and, if that fails, pulling out the fetus "in pieces."

But in a few spots, Dr. Carhart seems to be trying to find simple metaphors, and uses language that his critics called grossly inappropriate and revealing. When asked what tools he uses to extract a fetus, he first tries to joke, saying, "A pickax, a drill bit," but then becomes serious and says, "No ... there's just instruments that have been developed."

"The abortion lobby claims that the Gosnell clinic is an outlier, but the footage released this morning by Live Action reveals once more that the abortion industry treats women and children as mere pieces of meat," said Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, an anti-abortion group.

Tracy Weitz, a medical sociologist at the University of California, San Francisco, who viewed the video, said people should not be quick to pass judgment on a doctor based on a few phrases on a videotape. "Doctors struggle to find terminology to help a client understand what's happening, and while it may seem wrong to us, it may be appropriate for that conversation," she said.

In the video, Dr. Weitz said, Dr. Carhart shows compassion for the women and concern for their medical safety. "That's so different from what Dr. Gosnell is accused of," she said.

Dr. Carhart at one point counsels a woman that "it's your life that's going to be affected by this pregnancy and be affected by the termination."

"I mean, this baby is a part of you forever," he says.

The president of Live Action, Lila Rose, called Dr. Carhart a "grave threat to women and children," citing the death in February of a 29-year-old patient who was having an abortion at later than 30 weeks, apparently because the fetus had severe deformities. The Maryland medical examiner said the woman had died of natural causes from a rare complication of delivery.

The anti-abortion group Operation Rescue filed a complaint with the Maryland Board of Physicians, charging that Dr. Carhart had mismanaged the case and should lose his license. The board, according to a letter on Operation Rescue's Web site, said it would undertake a preliminary inquiry to see if a full investigation was warranted. The board, reached Wednesday, said its activities were confidential.


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

Well: The Scientific 7-Minute Workout

Exercise science is a fine and intellectually fascinating thing. But sometimes you just want someone to lay out guidelines for how to put the newest fitness research into practice.

An article in the May-June issue of the American College of Sports Medicine's Health & Fitness Journal does just that. In 12 exercises deploying only body weight, a chair and a wall, it fulfills the latest mandates for high-intensity effort, which essentially combines a long run and a visit to the weight room into about seven minutes of steady discomfort — all of it based on science.

"There's very good evidence" that high-intensity interval training provides "many of the fitness benefits of prolonged endurance training but in much less time," says Chris Jordan, the director of exercise physiology at the Human Performance Institute in Orlando, Fla., and co-author of the new article.

Work by scientists at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, and other institutions shows, for instance, that even a few minutes of training at an intensity approaching your maximum capacity produces molecular changes within muscles comparable to those of several hours of running or bike riding.

Interval training, though, requires intervals; the extremely intense activity must be intermingled with brief periods of recovery. In the program outlined by Mr. Jordan and his colleagues, this recovery is provided in part by a 10-second rest between exercises. But even more, he says, it's accomplished by alternating an exercise that emphasizes the large muscles in the upper body with those in the lower body. During the intermezzo, the unexercised muscles have a moment to, metaphorically, catch their breath, which makes the order of the exercises important.

The exercises should be performed in rapid succession, allowing 30 seconds for each, while, throughout, the intensity hovers at about an 8 on a discomfort scale of 1 to 10, Mr. Jordan says. Those seven minutes should be, in a word, unpleasant. The upside is, after seven minutes, you're done.


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

Prostate Cancer Test From Genomic Health Assesses Risks

Written By Unknown on Rabu, 08 Mei 2013 | 13.57

A new test can help distinguish aggressive prostate cancer from less threatening ones, potentially saving many men from unneeded operations for tumors that would never hurt them, researchers are reporting.

The test, developed by Genomic Health, could triple the number of men who could confidently monitor their tumors rather than undergo surgery or radiation treatments, according to the company and to researchers.

Results of a study assessing the test's performance will be presented Wednesday at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association in San Diego.

Many of the 240,000 cases of prostate cancer diagnosed each year in the United States are considered to pose a low risk of hurting or killing the man. But sometimes those assessments are wrong. So many men, reluctant to take the chance, undergo treatments that can cause impotence and incontinence.

"It's very hard to tell a surgeon 'I'd like to leave a cancer in place,' " said Dr. Jonathan Simons, president of the Prostate Cancer Foundation, a research and advocacy organization. "Having objective information is going to help a lot of patients make that decision."

Dr. Simons, who was not involved in the study, said the development of new genetic tests like the one from Genomic Health represented a "watershed," akin to going from pulse rate measurements to electrocardiograms in cardiology.

Still, some experts said it was too early to assess how accurate the test really was and whether it would make a difference in men's decisions. Insurers are going to want to know that before deciding to pay for the test, which will be available starting Wednesday at a list price of $3,820.

Even the senior investigator of the study, Dr. Peter R. Carroll, said he was not sure.

"Certainly for a group of men it will have an impact," Dr. Carroll, who is chairman of urology at the University of California, San Francisco, said in an interview. "The question is how many men and how many physicians."

The new test, which is called the Oncotype DX Prostate Cancer Test, is one of more than a dozen coming to market that use advanced genetic methods to help better manage prostate cancer. The most direct competitor to the Oncotype test is likely to be the Prolaris test, introduced last year by Myriad Genetics.

But Genomic Health's test has attracted attention because of the company's track record. It already sells a similar test for breast cancer, also Oncotype DX, that is widely used to help women decide whether they can forgo chemotherapy after their tumor is surgically removed.

Some analysts say that with the breast cancer test facing intensified competition, the company's future growth could hinge on the prostate test, which could take time to gain acceptance. Genomic Health's stock closed Tuesday at $33.87, up 1 percent.

The test looks at the activity level of 17 genes in the biopsy sample and computes a score from 0 to 100 showing the risk that cancer is aggressive.

To see how well the test worked, testing was performed on archived biopsy samples from 412 patients who had what was considered low or intermediate-risk cancer but then underwent surgery.

In many such cases, the tumor, which can be closely studied after it is surgically removed, turns out to be more aggressive than thought based on the biopsy, which looks at only a tiny sample of the tumor.

The researchers found that the Oncotype test predicted such unfavorable pathology more accurately than existing methods, which depend mainly on the Gleason score based on how the biopsy sample looks under the microscope.

Genomic Health said that 26 percent of the samples were classified as very low risk by its test, compared to only 5 to 10 percent for the existing methods. In some cases, however, the new test showed the cancer to be more aggressive than the existing methods.

Some experts not involved in the study were cautiously optimistic.

"They showed a pretty good correlation with the score and how it predicts things," said Dr. E. David Crawford, a professor of urology, surgery and radiation oncology at the University of Colorado. He has consulted for Myriad Genetics and said he might become a consultant to Genomic Health.

Dr. Stacy Loeb, assistant professor of urology at New York University, said, "I think it will help — they definitely showed it improves upon what we are using now." She said it was not clear, however, how the Genomic Health and Myriad tests compared to each other.


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

Hospital Billing Varies Wildly, U.S. Data Shows

A hospital in Livingston, N.J., charged $70,712 on average to implant a pacemaker, while a hospital in nearby Rahway, N.J., charged $101,945.

In Saint Augustine, Fla., one hospital typically billed nearly $40,000 to remove a gallbladder using minimally invasive surgery, while one in Orange Park, Fla., charged $91,000.

In one hospital in Dallas, the average bill for treating simple pneumonia was $14,610, while another there charged over $38,000.

Data being released for the first time by the government on Wednesday shows that hospitals charge Medicare wildly differing amounts — sometimes 10 to 20 times what Medicare typically reimburses — for the same procedure, raising questions about how hospitals determine prices and why they differ so widely.

The data for 3,300 hospitals, released by the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, shows wide variations not only regionally but among hospitals in the same area or city.

Government officials said that some of the variation might reflect the fact that some patients were sicker or required longer hospitalization.

Nonetheless, the data is likely to intensify a long debate over the methods that hospitals use to determine their charges.

Medicare does not actually pay the amount a hospital charges but instead uses a system of standardized payments to reimburse hospitals for treating specific conditions. Private insurers do not pay the full charge either, but negotiate payments with hospitals for specific treatments. Since many patients are covered by Medicare or have private insurance, they are not directly affected by what hospitals charge.

Experts say it is likely that the people who can afford it least — those with little or no insurance — are getting hit with extremely high hospitals bills that may bear little connection to the cost of treatment.

"If you're uninsured, they're going to ask you to pay," said Gerard Anderson, the director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Hospital Finance and Management.

The debate over medical costs is growing louder, spurred partly by President Obama's overhaul of the health insurance system.

Hospitals, in particular, have come under scrutiny for charges that are widely viewed as difficult to comprehend, even for experts. "Our goal is to make this information more transparent," Jonathan Blum, the director of the agency's Center for Medicare, said in an interview.

The data covers bills submitted from virtually every hospital in the country in 2011 for the 100 most common treatments and procedures performed in hospitals, like hip replacements, heart operations and gallbladder removal.

The hospitals were not given the data before its release by Medicare officials.

Some hospitals contacted Tuesday said that the higher bills they sent to Medicare reflected the fact that they were either teaching hospitals or they had treated sicker patients.

For example, billing records showed that Keck Hospital of the University of Southern California charged, on average, $123,885, for a major artificial joint replacement, six times the average amount that Medicare reimbursed for the procedure and a rate significantly higher than the average for other Los Angeles area hospitals.

"Academic medical centers have a higher cost structure, and higher acuity patients who suffer from many health complications," the hospital said.

The hospital added that it wrote off any difference between what it charged and what Medicare paid, rather than seeking to collect it from patients. Centinela Hospital Medical Center, also in Los Angeles and owned by Prime Healthcare Services, charged $220,881 for the same procedure.

A spokesman said the hospital served a sicker and older patient base.

The data showing the range of hospital bills does not explain why one hospital charges significantly more for a procedure than another one. And Medicare does pay slightly higher treatment rates to certain hospitals — like teaching facilities or hospitals in areas with high labor costs.

Mr. Blum, the Medicare official, said he would have anticipated variations of two- to threefold at the most in the difference between what hospitals charge.

However, hospitals submitted bills to Medicare that were, on average, about three to five times what the agency typically pays to treat a condition, an analysis of the data by The New York Times indicates. And variations between what hospitals charge may be even greater.

Mr. Blum said he could not explain the reasons for that large difference.

An official at the American Hospital Association, a trade group, said there was a cat-and-mouse game between hospitals and insurers that affects what hospitals charge.


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

Well: Winning Streaks in Sports

Phys Ed

Gretchen Reynolds on the science of fitness.

Winning streaks in sports may be more than just magical thinking, several new studies suggest.

Whether you call them winning streaks, "hot hands" or being "in the zone," most sports fans believe that players, and teams, tend to go on tears. Case in point: Nate Robinson's almost single-handed evisceration of the Miami Heat on Monday night. (Yes, I am a Bulls fan.)

But our faith in hot hands is challenged by a rich and well-regarded body of science over the past 30 years, much of it focused on basketball, that tells us our belief is mostly fallacious. In one of the first and best-known of these studies, published in 1985, scientists parsed records from the Philadelphia 76ers, the Boston Celtics and the Cornell University varsity squad and concluded that players statistically were not more likely to hit a second basket after sinking a first. But players and fans believed that they were, so a player who had hit one shot would be likely to take the team's next, and teammates would feed this "hot" player the ball.

Other studies showed that fans supported and bet on teams that they thought were on a hot streak, even though these bets rarely paid off. Our belief in them revealed how strongly humans want to impose order and meaning on utterly random sequences of events.

Now, however, some new studies that use huge, previously unavailable data sets are suggesting that, in some instances, hands can ignite, and the success of one play can indeed affect the outcome of the next.

In the most wide-ranging of the new studies, Gur Yaari, a computational biologist at Yale, and his colleagues gathered enormous amounts of data about an entire season's worth of free throw shooting in the N.B.A. and 50,000 games bowled in the Professional Bowlers Association. Subjecting these numbers to extensive (and, to the layperson, inscrutable) statistical analysis, they tried to determine whether the success or failure of a free throw or a bowling frame depended on what had just happened in the competitor's last attempt. In other words, if someone had just sunk a free throw or rolled a strike, was the person more likely to succeed immediately afterward? Or were the odds about the same as tossing a coin and seeing how it landed?

In these big sets of data, which were far larger than those used in, for instance, the 1985 basketball study, success did slightly increase the chances of subsequent success — though generally over a longer time frame than the next shot. Basketball players experienced statistically significant and recognizable hot periods over an entire game or two, during which they would hit more free throws than random chance would suggest. But they would not necessarily hit one free throw immediately after the last.
Similarly, bowlers who completed a high-scoring game were more likely to roll strikes in the next game. But a strike in one frame of each game was not statistically likely to lead to a strike in the next frame.

Hot streaks have some relevance in volleyball as well, as a 2012 study helpfully titled "The Hot Hand Exists in Volleyball" explores. Researchers at the German Sport University in Cologne examined match results for 26 elite volleyball players and identified statistically meaningful scoring streaks among half of them. The researchers also found that when a players got hot, teammates and coaches responded almost immediately in ways that moved the ball to the streaking player, increasing the team's likelihood of winning.

But if winning streaks have some rational basis, then by inference so would losing streaks, which makes the latest of the new studies, of basketball game play, particularly noteworthy. In that analysis, published last month in the journal Psychological Science, Yigal Attali, who holds a doctorate in cognitive psychology, scrutinized all available shooting statistics from the 2010-11 N.B.A. season.

He found that a player who drained one shot was more likely than chance would suggest to take the team's next shot — and also more likely than chance would suggest to miss it.

Essentially, he found that in real games, players developed anti-hot hands. A momentary success bred immediate subsequent failure.

The reason for this phenomenon might be both psychological and practical, Dr. Attali wrote; players seemed to take their second shots from farther out than their first ones, perhaps because they felt buoyed by that last success. They also were likely to be defended more vigorously after a successful shot, since defenders are as influenced by a belief in hot hands as anyone else.

But what the findings underscore, more subtly, is that patterns do exist within the results. The players were more likely to miss after a successful shot. And this anti-hot hand phenomenon, said Dr. Yaari, who is familiar with the study, was itself a pattern. "It is not completely random and independent" of past results, he said.

These new studies do not undermine the validity of the magisterial past research on hot hands, but expand and augment it, Dr. Yaari and the other authors say, adding even more human complexity. Yes, we probably imagine and desire patterns where they do not exist. But it may be that we also are capable of sensing and responding to some cues within games and activities that are almost too subtle for most collections of numbers to capture.

"I think that our minds evolved to be sensitive to these kinds of patterns," Dr. Yaari said, "since they occur frequently in nature."

And that is enough encouragement for me to believe that, against all rational expectations, the Bulls will carry the series against Miami. They're hot.


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

Patients Say Gastric-Band Procedure Won’t Guarantee Weight Loss

There will probably be no more bubbly Champagne or hefty steaks at political events. No more gobbling slices of pizza while on the campaign trail.

For Mr. Christie, the rewards of successful stomach-band surgery could be great, like reducing his risk of a premature death or having the chance to run for president as a slimmer person. But the consequences of not sticking to a post-surgery diet could be dire, like being forced to run to the bathroom after eating the wrong food or suffering the abject humiliation of being a public figure who still fails to lose weight publicly.

 "You really have to change your mind-set; it's a new way of eating," said David Ackerman, a Lap-Band patient.

An estimated 200,000 people a year have weight-loss surgery in the United States, and banding — placing a silicone band around the upper part of the stomach to restrict intake — is the least invasive and least risky type.

"We like to say that about a third of people do really well, a third so-so and a third not so well," said Dr. Hans Schmidt, chief of bariatric surgery at Hackensack University Medical Center.

Looking at Mr. Christie's photograph, Dr. Jaime Ponce, president of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, estimated that his weight could range from 350 to 450 pounds.

If Mr. Christie did well, he could lose about 150 pounds by 2016, Dr. Ponce said. "That would put him in a 250 range," he said. "He's still going to be looking like a big guy, but not overweight like he is now."

With the band in place, food has to be cut into small pieces and chewed well, and the band's very purpose can be circumvented with high-calorie shakes or soft foods.

Mr. Ackerman said he could no longer tolerate soda, because carbonated beverages irritate his stomach. So the governor "cannot go to a function and drink a ton of Champagne or beer," Mr. Ackerman, 59, a retired assistant principal in Brooklyn, said.

Pizza can get stuck. "Either it sits there and you feel like the lady in the commercial, with an elephant on your chest, or you're going to have to excuse yourself, it will come up," he said.

After lunch on Tuesday, Mr. Ackerman said he felt full on four ounces of fish. "In the past I would have eaten four or five times that," he said.

For him, the rewards have been worth the sacrifice. Since his operation at Maimonides Medical Center in Brooklyn in 2009, he has removed nearly 100 pounds from his 6-foot-4-inch frame, slimming a 42-inch waist to a 36. "The only thing that hasn't changed is my shoes," he said.

Others have been less successful. Another Maimonides patient, who asked not to be named because she did not want to embarrass her doctor, said her operation had been extremely frustrating. "It's definitely not as simple as people make it out to be," the woman said. JoAnn Savino, a customer service worker in Patchogue, on Long Island, went from Size 18 to Size 6 jeans after having the operation just over three years ago at North Shore-LIJ Health System.

But her diet is not well-suited to the political life, said Ms. Savino, 66. She cannot eat just any roadhouse steak. "I eat filet mignon," she said. "It's soft."

Still, she is sure that losing weight will make Mr. Christie a better father, husband and politician. "If you can't feel good about yourself, you can't help other people," Ms. Savino said.


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

National Briefing | West: California: Court Upholds Ban on Marijuana Dispensaries

Written By Unknown on Selasa, 07 Mei 2013 | 13.57

The California Supreme Court on Monday upheld the right of local governments to ban medical marijuana dispensaries. As dispensaries have proliferated since 1996, when California became the first state to allow medical marijuana, many municipalities across the state have used zoning laws to prohibits dispensaries from opening inside city limits. Patients and dispensary owners have argued that these local laws violate the state medical marijuana statutes by reducing patients' access to the drug. But the court unanimously upheld a ban in the City of Riverside, paving the way for more municipalities to prohibit marijuana dispensaries.


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

Pfizer Begins Selling Viagra Online

Niko J. Kallianiotis for The New York Times

Pfizer now sells Viagra, the erectile dysfunction drug that is one of its chief money makers, online to men with a prescription.

Pfizer has taken the unusual step of selling its erectile dysfunction drug, Viagra, to consumers on its Web site, in an effort to establish a presence in the huge online market for the popular blue pill, considered to be one of the most counterfeited drugs in the world.

Viagra is one of Pfizer's marquee drugs — the company said it brought in more than $2 billion in sales in 2012 — but some drug experts estimate Pfizer could be losing hundreds of millions of dollars a year to a prolific black market of online pharmacies that cater to men too embarrassed to buy the drug through traditional means. As of Monday, in an arrangement with CVS/pharmacy, patients in the United States with a valid prescription for Viagra are able to fill their order through the new Web site, where the sentence "Buy real Viagra" is featured prominently. Patients will still need to visit a doctor, but they will be spared the additional trip to the pharmacy counter.

If Pfizer's move is successful, more drug makers could follow suit, especially for other products that treat conditions carrying social stigmas, such as weight loss. "This could be the prelude to a vast number of products" of medical importance being sold online, said Roger Bate, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and an expert in counterfeit drugs.

But others cautioned against such predictions, saying that Viagra might be particularly well suited to online sales because of its powerful brand recognition and the widespread competition from counterfeiters.

Victor Clavelli, a marketing executive at Pfizer whose portfolio includes Viagra, said the drug appeared in about 24 million Internet searches a year, often in phrases like "buy Viagra" — well in excess of the approximately eight million Viagra prescriptions written in the United States last year, according to the research firm IMS Health. "A lot of those patients get diverted into an illegal counterfeit market," Mr. Clavelli said. "Our goal is to just make sure those patients actually get the real Viagra."

Since Viagra arrived on the market in 1998, Pfizer has sought to minimize the stigma around male impotence — rebranded as erectile dysfunction, or E.D. — by enlisting celebrity endorsers like the former Republican presidential candidate Bob Dole and encouraging men to have the "Viagra talk" with their doctors.

But even as men flooded doctors' offices for prescriptions for what is commonly known as "the little blue pill," others turned to a vigorous black market, whose growth mirrored an explosion in online commerce. "Viagra is one of the classics," said Mr. Bate. "Diet pills for women and erectile dysfunction medicines for men are the most sought-after medicines online."

Matthew J. Bassiur, vice president of Pfizer Global Security, said in a statement that the company had seen counterfeit medicines manufactured "in filthy and deplorable conditions, yet some people do not realize the risks that this poses to their health and safety, our top priority." He added that samples of counterfeit Viagra tested by Pfizer labs had contained "pesticides, wallboard, commercial paint and printer ink."

"These findings," Mr. Bassiur said, "motivate us to continue our aggressive global efforts to stop those who prey on unsuspecting patients."

Pfizer said it conducted a survey in 2011 in which it evaluated 22 Web sites appearing in the top search results for the phrase "buy Viagra." Chemical analyses found that about 80 percent of the pills were counterfeit. The fake Viagra pills contained only about 30 to 50 percent of the active ingredient, sildenafil citrate, compared with the actual product.

Not all medicines purchased online are fake, however — many pharmacies, based both in the United States and abroad, require a doctor's prescription and sell valid versions of drugs. Importing drugs from other countries is technically illegal, although the federal government generally does not prosecute individuals who purchase medicines in small amounts for their own use. The problem, Mr. Bate said, is that it is difficult for consumers to distinguish the legitimate pharmacies from the illicit ones. "For the very nervous purchaser online," he said, Pfizer is "a name brand you know really well, and the chance of your buying a counterfeit is close to zero." He noted, however, that some cash-paying customers may balk at the purchase price. The average list price for Viagra is about $22 a pill, while many online pharmacies sell it for about $10.

Some industry analysts saw Pfizer's move as part of a continuing effort to market drugs directly to consumers, bypassing insurance companies that can be reluctant to pay for so-called lifestyle drugs or that force consumers to pay hefty co-payments. The company said about 90 percent of privately insured patients in the United States receive coverage for Viagra, and co-payments can range from $29 to $49.

Customers who buy Viagra through the Pfizer Web site get three free pills in their first prescription — which typically consists of six pills — and 30 percent off their second prescription.

Mr. Clavelli, the Pfizer marketing executive, said the current Viagra discount was not unique to customers who buy through the online service and had been offered to patients online and at doctors' offices for months.

Another drug maker, AstraZeneca, has a similar arrangement with an outside pharmacy to sell the breast-cancer treatment Arimidex to patients.

Viagra has about 49 percent of the market for sexual dysfunction treatments, followed by Cialis, which holds 39.7 percent, and Levitra, with 8.6 percent, according to IMS Health.


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

Psychiatry’s New Guide Falls Short, Experts Say

Just weeks before the long-awaited publication of a new edition of the so-called bible of mental disorders, the federal government's most prominent psychiatric expert has said the book suffers from a scientific "lack of validity."

The expert, Dr. Thomas R. Insel, director of the National Institute of Mental Health, said in an interview Monday that his goal was to reshape the direction of psychiatric research to focus on biology, genetics and neuroscience so that scientists can define disorders by their causes, rather than their symptoms.

While the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or D.S.M., is the best tool now available for clinicians treating patients and should not be tossed out, he said, it does not reflect the complexity of many disorders, and its way of categorizing mental illnesses should not guide research.

"As long as the research community takes the D.S.M. to be a bible, we'll never make progress," Dr. Insel said, adding, "People think that everything has to match D.S.M. criteria, but you know what? Biology never read that book."

The revision, known as the D.S.M.-5 and the first since 1994, has stirred unprecedented questioning from the public, patient groups and, most fundamentally, senior figures in psychiatry who have challenged not only decisions about specific diagnoses but the scientific basis of the entire enterprise. Basic research into the biology of mental disorders and treatment has stalled, they say, confounded by the labyrinth of the brain.

Decades of spending on neuroscience have taught scientists mostly what they do not know, undermining some of their most elemental assumptions. Genetic glitches that appear to increase the risk of schizophrenia in one person may predispose others to autism-like symptoms, or bipolar disorder. The mechanisms of the field's most commonly used drugs — antidepressants like Prozac, and antipsychosis medications like Zyprexa — have revealed nothing about the causes of those disorders. And major drugmakers have scaled back psychiatric drug development, having virtually no new biological "targets" to shoot for.

Dr. Insel is one of a growing number of scientists who think that the field needs an entirely new paradigm for understanding mental disorders, though neither he nor anyone else knows exactly what it will look like.

Even the chairman of the task force making revisions to the D.S.M., Dr. David J. Kupfer, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh, said the new manual was faced with doing the best it could with the scientific evidence available.

"The problem that we've had in dealing with the data that we've had over the five to 10 years since we began the revision process of D.S.M.-5 is a failure of our neuroscience and biology to give us the level of diagnostic criteria, a level of sensitivity and specificity that we would be able to introduce into the diagnostic manual," Dr. Kupfer said.

The creators of the D.S.M. in the 1960s and '70s "were real heroes at the time," said Dr. Steven E. Hyman, a psychiatrist and neuroscientist at the Broad Institute and a former director at the National Institute of Mental Health. "They chose a model in which all psychiatric illnesses were represented as categories discontinuous with 'normal.' But this is totally wrong in a way they couldn't have imagined. So in fact what they produced was an absolute scientific nightmare. Many people who get one diagnosis get five diagnoses, but they don't have five diseases — they have one underlying condition."

Dr. Hyman, Dr. Insel and other experts said they hoped that the science of psychiatry would follow the direction of cancer research, which is moving from classifying tumors by where they occur in the body to characterizing them by their genetic and molecular signatures.

About two years ago, to spur a move in that direction, Dr. Insel started a federal project called Research Domain Criteria, or RDoC, which he highlighted in a blog post last week. Dr. Insel said in the blog that the National Institute of Mental Health would be "reorienting its research away from D.S.M. categories" because "patients with mental disorders deserve better." His commentary has created ripples throughout the mental health community.

Dr. Insel said in the interview that his motivation was not to disparage the D.S.M. as a clinical tool, but to encourage researchers and especially outside reviewers who screen proposals for financing from his agency to disregard its categories and investigate the biological underpinnings of disorders instead. He said he had heard from scientists whose proposals to study processes common to depression, schizophrenia and psychosis were rejected by grant reviewers because they cut across D.S.M. disease categories.

"They didn't get it," Dr. Insel said of the reviewers. "What we're trying to do with RDoC is say actually this is a fresh way to think about it." He added that he hoped researchers would also participate in projects funded through the Obama administration's new brain initiative.

Dr. Michael First, a psychiatry professor at Columbia who edited the last edition of the manual, said, "RDoC is clearly the way of the future," although it would take years to get results that could apply to patients. In the meantime, he said, "RDoC can't do what the D.S.M. does. The D.S.M. is what clinicians use. Patients will always come into offices with symptoms."

For at least a decade, Dr. First and others said, patients will continue to be diagnosed with D.S.M. categories as a guide, and insurance companies will reimburse with such diagnoses in mind.

Dr. Jeffrey Lieberman, the chairman of the psychiatry department at Columbia and president-elect of the American Psychiatric Association, which publishes the D.S.M., said that the new edition's refinements were "based on research in the last 20 years that will improve the utility of this guide for practitioners, and improve, however incrementally, the care patients receive."

He added: "The last thing we want to do is be defensive or apologetic about the state of our field. But at the same time, we're not satisfied with it either. There's nothing we'd like better than to have more scientific progress."


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

Republicans Readying New Offensive Over Health Law

WASHINGTON — As the administration struggles to put in place the final, complex piece of President Obama's signature health care law, an endeavor on a scale not seen since Medicare's creation nearly a half-century ago, Democrats are worried that major snags will be exploited by Republicans in next year's midterm elections.

Many Democrats also want to to see a more aggressive and visible president to push the law across the country. This week Mr. Obama is returning to the fray to an extent unseen since he signed the law in 2010, including a White House event on Friday to promote the law's benefits for women, the first in a series of appearances for health care this year.

A number of health insurance changes have already taken place, but this fall, just as the 2014 election season heats up, is the deadline for introducing the law's core feature: the insurance marketplaces, known as exchanges, where millions of uninsured Americans can buy coverage, with subsidies for many.

For the third time, Republicans are trying to make the law perhaps the biggest issue of the elections, and are preparing to exploit every problem that arises. After many unsuccessful efforts to repeal the law, the Republican-led House plans another vote soon. And Republican governors or legislatures in many states are balking at participating, leaving Washington responsible for the marketplaces.

"There are very few issues that are as personal and as tangible as health care, and the implementation of the law over the next year is going to reveal a lot of kinks, a lot of red tape, a lot of taxes, a lot of price increases and a lot of people forced into health care that they didn't anticipate," said Brad Dayspring, spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee. "It's going to be an issue that's front and center for voters even in a more tangible way than it was in 2010."

That year a conservative backlash against the new law helped Republicans take control of the House. But last year Mr. Obama was re-elected, and Democrats gained seats in Congress.

Democrats are worried about 2014 — a president's party typically loses seats in midterm years — and some have gone public with concerns about the pace of carrying out the law. Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, told an interviewer last week that he agreed with a recent comment by Senator Max Baucus of Montana, a Democratic architect of the law, who said "a train wreck" could occur this fall if preparations fell short.

The White House has allayed some worries, with briefings for Democrats about their public education plans, including PowerPoint presentations that show areas with target populations down to the block level.

"There's clearly some concern" among Democrats "that their constituents don't yet have all facts on how it will work, and that Republicans are filling that vacuum with partisan talking points," said Representative Steve Israel of New York, head of the House Democrats' campaign committee. "And the administration must use every tool they have to get around the obstructions and make it work."

The latest poll from the Kaiser Family Foundation, released last week, showed that Americans remain split on the law, although four in 10 are unaware that Mr. Obama's Affordable Health Care Act is indeed a law.

The Kaiser polls tracking Americans' attitudes in recent years have been generally consistent, with Democrats supporting the law and Republicans against it. But the percentage of respondents who are undecided has been building lately, to about a quarter. Administration officials said those were the people they were hoping to win over.

Democrats argue that repeal attempts will only hurt Republicans and alienate the very voters they are trying to appeal to — women, young adults and Latinos. Those are the groups most supportive of the law.

"If they think they're going to run the 2014 election on refighting the political battles of 2010, they're going to fare very poorly," said Dan Pfeiffer, Mr. Obama's chief strategist. "We're going to implement the law well, and we don't worry."


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

The Texas Tribune: Texas Lawmakers Set to Restore Women’s-Health Financing

Written By Unknown on Senin, 06 Mei 2013 | 13.57

Eddie Seal for The New York Times

Esmeralda Garcia, a health care assistant at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Edinburg, speaks with a client, Adriana Olvera.

The political fireworks and high-octane drama that accompanied lawmakers' 2011 fight over women's health care and abortion have been absent this legislative session. They have been replaced with some semblance of concession, as legislators on both sides of the aisle work quietly to restore financing for women's health services.

The Texas Tribune

Expanded coverage of Texas is produced by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit news organization. To join the conversation about this article, go to texastribune.org.

Reynaldo Leal for The Texas Tribune

Medical records in La Joya. More than 50 Texas clinics closed after the state's family-planning budget was cut by two-thirds.

They have done it with little more than a handshake agreement. Democrats will not die on the sword of bringing Planned Parenthood back into the fold, and Republicans will not put up additional barriers to women's access to care.

"The major difference is we're not fighting about it. We're just doing what's right for women and the state," State Representative Sarah Davis, Republican of West University Place, said last month at a Texas Tribune symposium on health care.

There has not been a drawn-out public debate on abortion or women's health in either chamber this legislative session. None of the 24 abortion-related bills filed have reached the House or Senate floor. And Ms. Davis, the only Republican member of the House Women's Health Caucus, brokered a bipartisan grand bargain, as lawmakers refer to it, to prevent amendments to the House budget bill that could have jeopardized an agreement to restore women's health dollars.

For some Republicans, this bargain hinged on the ballot box: Ms. Davis said several of her colleagues had faced blistering attacks after last session's family-planning cuts — an effort, in part, to drive Planned Parenthood out of business — closed clinics in their districts that were not affiliated with abortion providers.

Ms. Davis, a breast cancer survivor who opposes abortion but will not support legislation she believes interferes with the doctor-patient relationship, said the best way she had found to help low-income women was "to remove emotion" from the debate. The arguments about abortion and Planned Parenthood in 2011 "did not advance the ball," she said. "In fact, it just threw family planning into a tailspin."

Bolstered by the Tea Party's gains in the state's 2010 elections, last session's ultraconservative Legislature approved a law requiring women seeking an abortion to have a sonogram and hear a description of the fetus at least 24 hours before the procedure. In a targeted effort to exclude Planned Parenthood and other clinics affiliated with abortion providers from taxpayer-financed programs, lawmakers also cut the state's family-planning budget by two-thirds.

As a direct result, 117 Texas family-planning clinics stopped receiving state financing and 56 of those clinics closed, according to researchers at the University of Texas at Austin who are conducting a three-year study to evaluate the Legislature's policy changes.

The researchers estimate that 144,000 fewer women received health services and 30,000 fewer unintended pregnancies were averted in 2012 than in 2010. The state's savings from the programs dropped by an estimated $163 million.

"A lot of people really felt they got snookered by some of the people in the pro-life movement about that family-planning issue," said State Senator Bob Deuell, Republican of Greenville, who has been a strong advocate for restoring family-planning financing for low-income women by way of primary care.

Dr. Deuell, a primary care physician, is an ardent opponent of state money going to Planned Parenthood clinics. But he said the vitriol of some abortion opponents last session had prevented the state from pursuing good policy decisions. He recalled being compared to Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, when he argued that cutting family-planning services would lead to more unwanted pregnancies, and therefore more abortions and more children living in poverty.

In the tentative 2014-15 state budget, which is being worked out in conference committee, lawmakers have devoted more financing to women's health services than before the 2011 budget cuts. The House version of the budget doubled financing for family-planning services to $75 million, while the Senate version increases financing to $43 million. Both chambers have added $100 million to a state-run primary care program to serve women of all ages and set aside $71 million to support the Texas Women's Health Program, formerly the Medicaid Women's Health Program, which lost a $9-to-$1 federal match over state leaders' decision to eject Planned Parenthood clinics from it.

baaronson@texastribune.org


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

Concussion Fears Lead to Growth in Specialized Clinics for Young Athletes

Charlie Mahoney for The New York Times

Brian Lilja is a patient at the Boston Children's Hospital youth sports concussion clinic. His mother, Jennifer, said his injuries caused a "scary" personality change.

BOSTON — The drumbeat of alarming stories linking concussions among football players and other athletes to brain disease has led to a new and mushrooming American phenomenon: the specialized youth sports concussion clinic, which one day may be as common as a mall at the edge of town.

Charlie Mahoney for The New York Times

Isabelle Kindle, center, a hockey player at Wellesley High School in Massachusetts, recently returned to the ice after two concussions. There is no standard recommended recovery time for young athletes who have had a concussion. Doctors may consider genetic, biomedical or anatomical characteristics in addition to the severity of the injury.

In the last three years, dozens of youth concussion clinics have opened in nearly 35 states — outpatient centers often connected to large hospitals that are now filled with young athletes complaining of headaches, amnesia, dizziness or problems concentrating. The proliferation of clinics, however, comes at a time when there is still no agreed-upon, established formula for treating the injuries.

"It is inexact, a science in its infancy," said Dr. Michael O'Brien of the sports concussion clinic at Boston Children's Hospital. "We know much more than we once did, but there are lots of layers we still need to figure out."

Deep concern among parents about the effects of concussions is colliding with the imprecise understanding of the injury. To families whose anxiety has been stoked by reports of former N.F.L. players with degenerative brain disease, the new facilities are seen as the most expert care available. That has parents parading to the clinic waiting rooms.

The trend is playing out vividly in Boston, where the phone hardly stops ringing at the youth sports concussion clinic at Massachusetts General Hospital.

"Parents call saying, 'I saw a scary report about concussions on Oprah or on the 'Doctors' show or Katie Couric's show,' " Dr. Barbara Semakula said, describing a typical day at the clinic. "Their child just hurt his head, and they've already leapt to the worst possible scenarios. It's a little bit of a frenzy out there."

About three miles away, at Boston Children's Hospital, patient visits per month to its sports concussion clinic have increased more than fifteenfold in the last five years, to 400 from 25. The clinic, which once consisted of two consultation rooms, now employs nine doctors at four locations and operates six days a week.

"It used to be a completely different scene, with a child's father walking in reluctantly to tell us, 'He's fine; this concussion stuff is nonsense,' " said Dr. William Meehan, a clinic co-founder. "It's totally the opposite now. A kid has one concussion, and the parents are very worried about how he'll be functioning at 50 years old."

Doctors nationwide say the new focus on the dangers of concussions is long overdue. Concerned parents are properly seeking better care, which has saved and improved lives. But a confluence of outside forces has also spawned a mania of sorts that has turned the once-ignored concussion into the paramount medical fear of young athletes across the country.

Most prominent have been news media reports about scores of relatively young former professional athletes reporting serious cognitive problems and other later-life illnesses. Several ex-N.F.L. players who have committed suicide, most notably Junior Seau, a former San Diego Chargers and New England Patriots star, have been found posthumously to have had a degenerative brain disease linked to repeated head trauma.

State legislatures have commanded the attention of families as well, with 43 states passing laws requiring school-age athletes who have sustained a concussion to have written authorization from a medical professional, often one trained in concussion management, before they can return to their sport.

The two Boston clinics, one started in 2007 and the other in 2011, are typical examples of the concussion clinic phenomenon, busy centers of a new branch of American health care and windows into the crux of a mounting youth sports fixation.

"We are really in the trenches of a new medical experience," said Richard Ginsburg, the director of psychological services at Massachusetts General Hospital's youth sports concussion clinic. "First of all, there's some hysteria, so a big part of our job is to educate people that 90 percent of concussions are resolved in a month, if not sooner. As for the other 10 percent of patients, they need somewhere to go.

"So we see them. We see it all."

Uncertainty Among Doctors


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

Well: A Musical Message for Children on Healthy Eating

For all her talent and determination to help children eat better, Michelle Obama could still pick up a few pointers from Helen Butleroff-Leahy, a 66-year-old former Rockette turned registered dietitian.

Ms. Butleroff-Leahy devotes her time to teaching children in disadvantaged neighborhoods about eating healthfully and exercising regularly. Her lessons take the form of musical productions, rehearsed in classrooms and on the stages of 52 New York City public schools so far. Children from each school do gymnastics and dance to a rap-based script by Roumel Reaux that entertains while explaining the essentials of good nutrition. The 45-minute production by Ms. Butleroff-Leahy is called "My Plate: The New Food Guide Musical."

Truth be told, Ms. Butleroff-Leahy's lessons, both nutritional and dramatic, could benefit American children in every socioeconomic group, for none are immune to the foods laden with sugar, salt and calories that pervade our society, both within and outside schools. I had the opportunity to watch her in action last month at P. S. 81 in Bushwick, Brooklyn, where enthusiastic 8-year-olds from four second-grade classes joined four professionals to proclaim the virtues of "eating for the health of it."

Tramaine Montell Ford, a dancer who performed in the movie "Hairspray," portrayed an angelic "bad habit breaker" intent on reforming two junk-food junkies. The actors demonstrated the stultifying effects of poor nutrition, followed by Mr. Ford's energizing message:

You are what you eat.

You got the power, you got the might

To eat right and keep it light.

The action then focused on food groups that foster good health: grains (whole, please) for breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks; vegetables (especially dark-green and orange) and fruits (all colors are nutritious and delicious) for myriad health essentials; protein (meats, beans and nuts) for the strength to get up and go; and dairy (light or skim) for strong bones.

To celebrate vegetables, for example, green-shirted youngsters danced to "Rock Around the Clock," did cartwheels and jumping jacks and spun hula hoops, while other children in red and yellow shirts did break-dancing to Mr. Ford's rap about 20 different vegetables, which he called "one of nature's greatest wonders."

Ms. Butleroff-Leahy spends three hours a week for 10 weeks in each school, devoting half an hour in each of three classes to hands-on nutrition lessons and the remaining half-hour to learning and rehearsing the musical. The school then tries to incorporate nutrition information into other lessons and lunchroom offerings. Cheryl Ault-Barker, the principal of P.S. 81, said a salad bar now competes successfully with the usual school lunch fare at her school.

Still dancer-lean with a cheerleader's energy, Ms. Butleroff-Leahy said her mission was to help counter the city's rising rates of childhood obesity and its sooner-or-later consequences, including Type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure and heart disease. "Children learn best through active participation and repetition, both in the classroom and on the stage," Ms. Butleroff-Leahy said.

The youngsters' teachers and parents, many with their own significant weight issues, learn alongside the children, who bring their classroom lessons home. One mother at P.S. 81 proudly reported that she'd switched from whole milk to 1 percent, and one of the boys said he now has whole-wheat bread and oat cereal for breakfast.

The project is underwritten by the Ficalora Family Foundation in association with Ms. Butleroff-Leahy's nonprofit company, the Nutrition and Fitness Education Initiative Inc., and is supplemented by small grants from New York State and the city's Department of Education, which contributes $1,500 to the school. Each production, start to final applause, costs about $4,000.

Ms. Butleroff-Leahy she said she hoped to be able to bring her musical message about healthy eating and exercise to many more schools throughout the country.

Of course, hers is but one of many philanthropic projects, local and national, aimed at countering the often atrocious eating habits of children by arming them with the information and enthusiasm they need to make better food choices.

The Children's Aid Society, for example, has a Go!Healthy initiative that sponsors an "Iron Go!Chef" competition to teach wellness with nutrition and healthy cooking programs for young children. The initiative includes a 24-week nutrition and fitness curriculum for schools and a six-week wellness program for parents that emphasizes movement, stress reduction and healthy cooking.

The Agriculture Department, which oversees school-based food programs, has recently updated the nutrition standards for school meals and is considering guidelines to ensure that the snacks and drinks available in schools also support good health.

New menus or school breakfasts and lunches became effective at the start of the current school year. They include more fruits, vegetables and whole grains, and are designed to provide nutrient-dense meals from a variety of foods in amounts that support healthy weights for children of different ages.

Students must select at least half a cup of fruit or vegetables at both lunch and breakfast. There are graduated reductions in salt and limits on saturated fats and fruit juices; milk can be only unflavored low-fat, or flavored and unflavored fat-free. Within two years, all grains served must be "whole grain-rich."

School meals provide up to half the calories children consume, and foods that support good nutrition improve children's behavior, performance and overall cognitive development, according to the Alliance for a Healthier Generation.

The alliance, which maintains that "schools are powerful places to shape the health, education and well-being of our children," helps more than 15,000 schools across the country create environments that encourage healthy eating and physical activity.

But however hard schools may try, their efforts can be easily undermined by pervasive societal influences. For example, while Nickelodeon has made some improvements in the kinds of foods advertised during its television programs for children, a new analysis of food ads during 28 hours of programs by the Center for Science in the Public Interest found that "nearly 70 percent are for junk."

"Nickelodeon congratulates itself for running the occasional public service announcement promoting physical activity, but for each of those messages it's running 30 ads for junk food," said Margo G. Wooten, the center's director for nutrition policy.

The network has made improvements. In 2005, an analysis by the center found that 88 percent of food ads on Nickelodeon were for unhealthy foods, but a similar sampling in 2012 showed a decline to 69 percent, which may reflect growing pressure on the food industry to reduce marketing to children. Nickelodeon could take a lesson from junk-food-free Qubo, a block of programming for children on the ION Television network.

Or perhaps Nickelodeon's advertising executives should sit in on one of Ms. Butleroff-Leahy's school productions.


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

Well: Sucking Your Child’s Pacifier Clean May Have Benefits

For years, health officials have told parents not to share utensils with their babies or clean their pacifiers by putting them in their mouths, arguing that the practice spreads harmful germs between parent and child. But new research may turn that thinking on its head.

In a study published Monday in the journal Pediatrics, scientists report that infants whose parents sucked on their pacifiers to clean them developed fewer allergies than children whose parents typically rinsed or boiled them. They also had lower rates of eczema, fewer signs of asthma and smaller amounts of a type of white blood cell that rises in response to allergies and other disorders.

The findings add to growing evidence that some degree of exposure to germs at an early age benefits children, and that microbial deprivation might backfire, preventing the immune system from developing a tolerance to trivial threats.

The study, carried out in Sweden, could not prove that the pacifiers laden with parents' saliva were the direct cause of the reduced allergies. The practice may be a marker for parents who are generally more relaxed about shielding their children from dirt and germs, said Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious diseases expert at Vanderbilt University who was not involved in the research.

"It's a very interesting study that adds to this idea that a certain kind of interaction with the microbial environment is actually a good thing for infants and children," he said. "I wonder if the parents that cleaned the pacifiers orally were just more accepting of the old saying that you've got to eat a peck of dirt. Maybe they just had a less 'disinfected' environment in their homes."

Studies show that the microbial world in which a child is reared plays a role in allergy development, seemingly from birth. Babies delivered vaginally accumulate markedly different bacteria on their skin and in their guts than babies delivered by Caesarean section, and that in turn has been linked in studies to a lower risk of hay fever, asthma and food allergies. But whether a mother who puts a child's pacifier in her mouth or feeds the child with her own spoon might be providing similar protection is something that had not been closely studied, said Dr. Bill Hesselmar, the lead author of the study.

In fact, health officials routinely discourage such habits, saying they promote tooth decay by transferring cavity-causing bacteria from a parent's mouth to the child's. In February, the New York City health department started a subway ad campaign warning parents of the risk. "Don't share utensils or bites of food with your baby," the ads say. "Use water, not your mouth, to clean off a pacifier."

In the new study, doctors at the University of Gothenburg and elsewhere followed a group of about 180 children from birth. The children were examined regularly by a pediatric allergist, and their parents were instructed to keep diaries recording details about food introduction, weaning and other significant events.

By the age of 18 months, about a quarter of the children had eczema, and 5 percent had asthma. Those whose parents reported at least occasionally cleaning their children's pacifiers by sucking them were significantly less likely to develop the conditions — particularly eczema — and blood tests showed that they had lower levels of a type of immune cell associated with allergies. Analyses of the children's saliva also showed patterns that suggested the practice had altered the kinds of microbes in their mouths.

The researchers then looked to see if the method of childbirth provided any additional protection.

It did. The children who were delivered through Caesarean section and whose pacifiers were rinsed or boiled had the highest prevalence of eczema, nearly 55 percent. The group with the lowest prevalence of eczema, about 20 percent, were born traditionally and had parents who cleaned their pacifiers in their mouths.

But are these parents also transmitting harmful infections to their children?

The bacterium that causes dental cavities, Streptococcus mutans, is highly contagious. Studies show that children can be infected at a very young age, and that the strain they pick up is usually one that they get from their mothers. That is why health authorities tell parents to do things that can lower the rate of transmission to their children, like not sharing utensils or putting their mouths on pacifiers.

But Dr. Joel Berg, president of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, said those efforts are misguided, since parents are bound to spread germs simply by kissing their children and being around them. "This notion of not feeding your baby with your spoon or your fork is absurd because if the mom is in close proximity to the baby you can't prevent that transmission," he said. "There's no evidence that you can avoid it. It's impossible unless you wear a mask or you don't touch the child, which isn't realistic."

Dr. Berg, who does salivary research at the University of Washington, said the new findings underscore something he has been telling his patients for years, that "saliva is your friend." It contains enzymes, proteins, electrolytes and other beneficial substances, some of which can perhaps be passed from parent to child.

"I think, like any new study, this is going to be challenged and questioned," he said. "But what it points out pretty clearly is that we are yet to fully discover the many and varied benefits of saliva."


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

Opinion: A Child’s Wild Kingdom

Written By Unknown on Minggu, 05 Mei 2013 | 13.57

IN a couple of weeks, my daughter will turn into a dolphin. Right now, she's a fox. Last year, she was a cricket.

That's just how it works at the Montessori school where she goes. Instead of "4-year-olds" and "5-year-olds," or even "preschoolers" and "kindergartners," each class is given an animal name and, at the end of every school year, the children graduate into being a different species entirely, shape-shifting like spirits in an aboriginal legend.

It can be a little alarming to step back and realize just how animal-centric the typical American preschool classroom is. Maybe the kids sing songs about baby belugas, or construction-paper songbirds fly across the walls. Maybe newborn ducklings nuzzle in an incubator in the corner. But the truth is, my daughter's world has overflowed with wild animals since it first came into focus. They've been plush and whittled; knitted, batiked and bean-stuffed; embroidered into the ankles of her socks or foraging on the pages of every storybook.

Most parents won't be surprised to learn that when a Purdue University child psychologist pulled a random sample of 100 children's books, she found only 11 that did not have animals in them.

But what's baffled me most nights at bedtime is how rarely the animals in these books even have anything to do with nature. Usually, they're just arbitrary stand-ins for people, like the ungainly pig that yearns to be a figure skater, or the family of raccoons that bakes hamantaschen for the family of beavers at Purim. And once I tuned in to that — into the startling strangeness of how insistently our culture connects kids and wild creatures — all the animal paraphernalia in our house started to feel slightly insane. As Kieran Suckling, the executive director of the conservation group Center for Biological Diversity, pointed out to me, "Right when someone is learning to be human, we surround them with nonhumans."

SCIENCE has some explanations to offer. Almost from birth, children seem drawn to other creatures all on their own. In studies, babies as young as 6 months try to get closer to, and provoke more physical contact with, actual dogs and cats than they do with battery-operated imitations.

Infants will smile more at a living rabbit than at a toy rabbit. Even 2-day-old babies have been shown to pay closer attention to "a dozen spotlights representing the joints and contours of a walking hen" than to a similar, randomly generated pattern of lights.

It all provides evidence for what the Harvard entomologist Edward O. Wilson calls "biophilia" — his theory that human beings are inherently attuned to other life-forms. It's as though we have a deep well of attention set aside for animals, a powerful but uncategorized interest waiting to be channeled into more cogent feelings, like fascination or fear.

Young children have been shown to acquire fears of spiders and snakes more quickly than fears of guns and other human-manufactured dangers. And in this case, the researchers Judith H. Heerwagen and Gordon H. Orians offer one logical, evolutionary explanation: if you are an infant or toddler spending a lot of time on the ground, it pays to learn quickly to fear snakes and spiders. Fear of big predators like bears and wolves, on the other hand, doesn't kick in until after age 4, around when the first human children would have begun roaming outside of their camps.

Children also fixate on animals in their imaginative lives. In her book "Why the Wild Things Are," Gail F. Melson, a psychologist at Purdue, reports that kids see animals in the inkblots of the Rorschach test twice as often as adults do, and that, when a Tufts University psychologist went into a New Haven preschool decades ago and asked kids to tell her a story that they'd made up on the spot, between 65 and 80 percent of them told her a story about animals. (The heartbreaking minimalism of one of these stories, by a boy named Bart, still haunts me: "Once there was a lion. He ate everybody up. He ate himself up.")

Jon Mooallem is a contributing writer to The New York Times Magazine and the author of "Wild Ones: A Sometimes Dismaying, Weirdly Reassuring Story About Looking at People Looking at Animals in America," from which this essay is adapted.


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More

Economic View: An Economic Cure for Pandemics

THAT frightening word "pandemic" is back in the news. A strain of avian influenza has infected people in China, with a death toll of more than 25 as of late last week. The outbreak raises renewed questions about how to prepare for possible risks, should the strain become more easily communicable or should other deadly variations arise.

Our current health care policies are not optimal for dealing with pandemics. The central problem is that these policies neglect what economists call "public goods": items and services that benefit many people and can't easily be withheld from those who don't pay for them directly.

Protection against communicable diseases is a core example of a public good, as is basic scientific research, which can yield new ideas that may be spread at very low additional cost. (In contrast, Medicare, which is publicly financed, has some elements of a public good, but any particular expenditure tends to benefit an individual receiving treatment, rather than being spread over a number of beneficiaries.)

One obvious step forward would be to exempt biomedical research from cuts of the current federal budget sequestration. Research and development grants are a way to pay potential innovators up front — an important move, as an innovator can't always charge high-enough prices for the value of its remedies when they're actually needed.

If a pandemic became a major issue in the United States, demand for remedies would surge far beyond the level associated with a typical seasonal flu outbreak, and permitting high prices would be unpopular — and perhaps unfair. The threat of contagion also makes it crucial to spread the net of protection as widely as possible, which again suggests low prices.

Yet it is crucial to have some reward system in place for medical innovators. Well in advance of a pandemic, research needs to be done, and vaccine capacity and drug distribution facilities need to be built up. In the H.I.V./AIDS crisis, for instance, the United States was caught flat-footed — and an appropriate response has taken decades, in part because we were not prepared. Without government financing for such public goods, the capacity wouldn't be there if a new pandemic produced a surge in demand. This would amount to an institutional failure.

The government could also take another, more unusual step: it could promise to pay lucrative prices for the patents on drugs and vaccines that prove useful in dealing with pandemics. The point of buying the patent is to distribute the remedy, if needed, as widely and as cheaply as possible. If the pandemic never occurs, the reward wouldn't have to be paid. But the very promise of such a reward might induce suppliers to take the risk of increasing capacity in advance.

Without such a government promise, private patents could easily lead to very high prices and limited distribution, as has already occurred for some cancer drugs, which are being sold to patients for more than $100,000 a year.

If anyone doubted a government pledge to pay big money for the rights to remedies, the patent's value could be established by a competitive auction. Michael Kremer, a Harvard economics professor, outlined the procedure for such an auction in his research paper "Patent Buyouts."

The government should resist the strong temptation to skimp on rewards. Many health care breakthroughs come through university research programs and government grants, but bringing an innovation to fruition and managing wide and rapid distribution usually requires the profit-seeking private sector. In any single instance, the government could save money by confiscating rights, but in the longer run this would discourage the search for additional remedies.

If anything, the American government — or, better yet, a consortium of governments — should pay more for pandemic remedies than what market-based auctions would yield. That's because, if a major pandemic does arise, other countries may not respect intellectual property rights as they scramble to copy a drug or vaccine for domestic distribution. To encourage innovations, policy makers need to bolster the expectation of rewards.

How many drugs should we cover with such prizes, and then distribute free or at minimal charge? It's an interesting but perhaps insoluble moral question. But in the meantime, economics can offer practical advice. If the remedy is a public good, as is the case in fighting a communicable disease, the value of widespread treatment will make cheap distribution a good idea.

Unfortunately, the United States lacks strong political coalitions for many beneficial public health measures. The Democratic Party has focused on insurance coverage and Medicaid expansion as political issues, while often wishing to lower prices of drugs or to weaken patent protection. The Obama administration's new budget lowers spending on pharmaceuticals by an estimated $164 billion over 10 years, mostly through bargaining down Medicare drug prices. That makes it hard for the Democrats to embrace lucrative rewards for pharmaceutical companies or vaccine producers.

Nor can we expect much on pandemic preparation from the current Republican Party, which has been focusing its fiscal conservatism on discretionary spending. That means disproportionate cuts for public health and research and development. This decision can be seen as at odds with a true conservative philosophy, which usually embraces the provision of public goods like a strong military and general national security. Such goods can also serve the purpose of protecting against bioterror.

OVER all, the American government seems to be turning its back on its traditional role of producing and investing in national public goods. If there is any consistent tendency in recent government spending, it is that spending on entitlements like Social Security and Medicare — which provide mostly private benefits — is rising and that investment and spending on national public goods is falling.

As a budget category, "government consumption and gross investment" is a proxy for many kinds of public goods spending. As a share of gross domestic product, it has fallen to less than 19 percent, from a peak of 24 percent in the 1980s, with no expected reversal in sight. Yet total government spending is expected to increase because of income transfers and entitlements. Neither political party seems able to halt that logic or even cares to make an issue of it.

Focusing government on the production of public goods may sound like a trivial issue, too obvious to be worth a mention. But, in fact, we have been failing at it, and the consequences could be serious indeed.

Tyler Cowen is a professor of economics at George Mason University.


13.57 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger